Proof of yet another Weyl’s inequality using Courant

$\begingroup$

The Courant-Fischer theorem states that $$\lambda_j=\max_{\dim(\mathbb{V})=j}\min_{v\in \mathbb{V},v\neq 0}\rho(v,A)=\min_{\dim(\mathbb{W})=n-j+1}\max_{w\in \mathbb{W},w\neq0}\rho(v,A)$$ where $\lambda_j$ is the $j$th entry of the largest to smallest sequence of eigenvalues of a Hermitian matrix $A$. $\rho(v,A)$ denotes the Rayleigh quotient.

We must show Weyl’s inequality:

Let $B=A+E$ where $A$ and $E$ are hermitian matrices and $\lambda_j$ and $\mu_j$ denote the $j$th eigenvalue (largest to smallest) of $B$ and $A$ respectively. Then $$|\lambda_j-\mu_j|\leq ||E||_2$$

I tried squaring both sides so that I could use Courant-Fischer on the largest eigenvalue of $E$ but I wound up with very complicated expressions on both sides of the inequality.

I’ve tried looking for references online, but every document I find states a version of Weyl’s inequality that is so different I would need to make another MSE post entirely to ask for a proof of equivalency.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer

$\begingroup$

Since $E$ is Hermitian, it is unitarily diagonalisable. Hence $|\rho(w,E)|\le\|E\|_2$ for every $w\ne0$ and\begin{aligned} \lambda_j &=\min_{\dim W=n-j+1}\max_{w\in W\setminus0}\rho(w,A)\\ &=\min_{\dim W=n-j+1}\left(\max_{w\in W\setminus0}\rho(w,B)+\rho(w,E)\right)\\ &\le\min_{\dim W=n-j+1}\left(\max_{w\in W\setminus0}\rho(w,B)+\|E\|_2\right)\\ &=\mu_j+\|E\|_2.\end{aligned}Similarly, by interchanging the roles of $A$ and $B$ in the above, we also have$\mu_j\le\lambda_j+\|E\|_2$. Combining the two inequalities, we get $|\lambda_j-\mu_j|\le\|E\|_2$.

$\endgroup$ 5

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

You Might Also Like